On the background of the initial welcome-shower of massive distrust and prejudice trying to find fault where fault is not to be found, I find any further rituals of obedience to a lurking dominator and a propagandist mind of feminist stripe too sivilizing. What I mean by "lurking" in this context is a double-faced character who tries to dominate by labeling not in theory, but in practice people having an independent mind with a different opinion a tyrant with the help of fuzzy logic that, when zoomed in properly, becomes meaningless. It follows that even for a woke dishonest spiritualist who loves relatively arrogant comments about anything outside their personal imaginary wonderland, practice is darned important.

Speaking of movements, advocating something very different from one’s own rant and movements in practice (moments of truth) fails to build up the trust needed for co-operation against the abuse of administrative power, to be honest, the latter being the main reason why I joined the Substack community in order to contact the author of some ideas that looked promising and worth discussing to sort out our most important common goals. I pardon my “twisted soul health” as an emotionally unstable mindset with a fragile woke common sense seems to be willing to interpret a much more complex reality, but it seems reasonable to end an increasingly pointless conversation the way it seems to progress and free up any further wasted time for anyone following. For those having found more solid grounds of a promising partnership than not doing what you preach, the handle to join an honest and meaningful conversation truly reflecting in practice has been provided below.

In order to wrap this lengthy conversation up in a decent, constructive and meaninful way, however, I conclude with a parable. In the world of tennis, when playing a pusher (a plain one, not a powerful combo), you probably want to give a lesson by mirroring the lazy provocative movements of your opponent in order to lead the game to an obvious overall embarrassment and this way turn your opponent into a better player, hopefully. Unfortunately, many people don’t learn, including the self-overconfident gifted pretenders living in their personal wonderland that I have encountered. Betraying people who share your core goals and labeling them betrayers in response to due critics without a reason, however, is definitely not characteristic of a problem solver and seems to go without much notice here, but speaking of the problems that the Creator would like to solve, this one in particular belongs to this category.

As for other departments of life, the results likewise greatly depend on the opponent's memory or honesty whether the player is going to end up on the side that is of benefit for everybody, or the one where you keep repeating in dead-end cycles, potentially infinitely. There are too many people whose hypocrisy when trying to find excuses for their agendas and consequently the overall lazy movement never changes toward the better and this problem boils down to character. Only when the student is ready will the teacher come.

In communities where the students are ready, however, there will be great results. It means that the members of such communities have been carefully selected. This is the way we can take care of our social movements in some of our everyday public life, i.e. where we are heading as communities wherever we have the luxury of sound and self-explanatory domain logic and carefully selecting the community members on that basis to serve as a role model for other communities aka parallel structures. This luxury deserves protection and from my own experience I can predict results that are worth putting in a lot of effort. Now being selective includes a tough and unpleasant display of character every now and then that a serious wannabe prefers to skip by all means, which is exactly the source where you should be looking for causes of failure to find not just good-to-write-about, but working solutions.

On the other hand, where the conversation is not very unipolar or harmonious, something like batting the ball over the net – or messaging our opinions in a Substack thread like the one you are reading now – can become a somewhat constructive form of co-operation if there is a sufficient amount of respect for your opponent as well as for the basic rules of the game. It's called practice in tennis if there is, or a no-thanks if not even the basic respect is to be found. I feel that our communication is about to drop to the latter level as the result of the continued relentless inversion of cause and effect to fool third parties, which makes further communication meaningless and pointless. You need to be honest to play or have a dialogue in any other form in a meaningful way. If you lobbed your opponent, however, and don't like your own choice of both players hitting from the baseline now then you are welcome to move forward to the net yourself – a place on court the pushers don’t like as they’ll be kept honest here much more convincingly, and similarly in other sports, too:

A historic FIFA World Cup match

At, say, 6-0, would you give a soccer ball to each player to end the misery or rather go with the soccer version of the game of musical chairs (or rather just a ball with a “spiritually criminal” ratio of 1 to 22) – a really bitter one in this case? The cage of a hungry tiger has always been a stupid place for the “stupid peasants” obviously lacking appropriate experience to walk in, so why do it and ignore the warnings like a five-year-old, including the really harsh ones meant to draw the attention of obviously stupid people to what is stupidly dangerous or otherwise uncompromisingly important to realize?

Although writing on Substack and playing ball games might seem to have nothing in common at first glance, there is a reason for why things don't work. And everybody has a good character potential to work on – the spiritual thingy kept honest. You can easily find the meaning of life here, by the way, so build some character in practice, love overcoming your weaknesses, and be polite and thankful to the opponent who showed a rewarding direction of movement, and you usually get rewarded beyond what you can imagine instead of continued vile painting of reality by an increasingly petty soul fit for guiding a truly mediocre movement at best, to be honest.

Regarding BS, once again: "Too many people in this world make excuses for their problems. You take responsibility and try and do better next time. That's all." Movement in the right direction or against the wrong direction is spiritually healing, and by the way, this is how you really heal the world around you – starting with yourself:

Some self-healing philosophies in the game of tennis revisited

On the other hand, we are all somewhat pushers. The pusher component in us helps delegate some of the unpleasant error-making to other people and save a lot of social credit for the wobbly which is the non-BS concrete practical situation where our lurking era of distortion largely originates in, or at least a considerable amount of energy for others. It doesn’t help with learning nor becoming a better character/soul though. Provocations to show your opponent in false light is forbidden in ball games basically, but it is doable on Substack, kind of. It doesn’t mean that the rules of tennis were written by a tyrant. In fact, the logic behind such regulations is the exact opposite.

What I learned from this soul health twisting experience is that all that glitters is not gold (or at least there is a lot of homework-before-co-op to do in that department), and being excellent at describing problems can be a long way from being suitable at a basic level of solving them in practice. And I mean serious practice, not just cheap theoretical propaganda in the narrow interests of a lurking gang of masonic (bitch mode) feminists infecting the public with labels of distortion, deliberately or not.

What do you think about playing a pusher outside of a tennis court, in plain and simple everyday life? To what extent should it be tolerated? Is it somewhat of the classical Venus vs Mars matter, or not in that category at all? Any other ideas? You are welcome to comment. Maybe I’ll find time to reply to some of these comments and develop partnership along the way despite my first kind of hanging attempt here against the abuse of administrative power with people having the necessary reasonable tolerance of each other’s differences that every healthy civilization is based on as well as a basic vision of a successful creative movement in this direction, its purpose and optimal scope.

Share